I’m not competent in any approach to pull conclusions from this box though I’ve been following it as well as we wondered if hardcore Bain hearing supporters could illuminate flaws inside of this theory!
Right so;
David Bain was Robin Bain’s prime kid
He might have essentially created which note upon a computer
The total family was during a residence which week end (which we do not consider was a unchanging occurrence?)
Why couldn’t Robin Bain have killed a rest of a family?
Then David got home as well as detected this, as well as in his anger/confusion/shock killed Robin (and usually Robin).
Then which would insist a ‘awkward’ approach a gun was held- ie he did not kill himself.
Tell me because we consider this isn’t possible

I’m from canada I read the story for the first time very interesting case hard to say what really happened there is going to be a retrial , there trying the defence to put the blame on the dad because of incestuous allegations but they say there are no finger prints from the dad on the weapon that the dad supposed to have used if he had commit suicide well he couldn’t have wiped off his finger prints i think they need to do the trial over but I think it looks like the kid David is guilty!thanks again this was interesting article! the theory that David came home and was overcome with despair because his Dad killed everyone it could have happened I guess this could be one way he could get off with a lesser sentence…